STI Naga branch is not approved to offer Bachelor of Science in Tourism Management (BSTM), Commission on Higher Education (CHED) Regional chief George M. Colorado confirmed.
In a meeting held November 7 at the library of said school, Colorado stressed that the school had effectively gotten a notice as ahead of schedule as two years prior.
"We over and over told the school that it is not permitted to offer Bachelor of Science in Tourism Management (BSTM). However, they kept on offering a similar course to the understudies," he said.
A few days ago, CHED issued another update that the school is not approved to offer BSTM.
"STI Naga does not have qualified instructors for said course," Colorado emphasized.
As of now, the understudies and guardians have stood up to Jessica Dionne Ramos Nunag, the authoritative officer of STI Naga.
"Two years prior, delegates of STI Naga have been making rounds, publicizing their course offerings, including BSMT. I feel extremely furious on the grounds that it is just now that I discovered that they have been cautioned by CHED not to push through with the opening of the said course, since they have not met the guidelines and necessities set by the legislature. In any case, they demanded and consistently tricked us, Nenita (not her genuine name) trusted to the BICOL STANDARD.
Nunag offered a few arrangements, be that as it may, to the understudies.
In the first place, they were tirelessly convinced to move to another course, similar to Hotel and Restaurant Management (HRM). She said the school will help them exchange to their preferred school, so that some of their subjects could be credited, with the exception of the subjects in BSMT.
Second, Nunag guaranteed the understudies that they will discount the sum spent for the subjects that would not be credited.
Dir. Colorado, likewise underscored that it is conceivable that not every one of the subjects that they took at STI Naga might be credited since different schools may have their own particular arrangement of standards.
In the interim, a few understudies met by the BICOL STANDARD griped that with these advancements, they are unquestionably at the losing end since the majority of the subjects they took for as long as two years would not be credited.
They included that, regardless of the possibility that the school repaid the educational cost charges that they spent in taking said subjects, they would have squandered two years of their time in light of the fact that as per them, the school organization intentionally betrayed them.
Next
« Prev Post
« Prev Post
Previous
Next Post »
Next Post »
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Show Konversi KodeHide Konversi Kode Show EmoticonHide Emoticon